Home
|-Basics
|-Commerce
|-Computer
Abuse
|-Intellectual
| '-+Electronic copyright
| '--++DMCA
| '--++Links & MetaTag
| '-+Interoperability
| '-+Licensing
| '--++Cyberlicenses
| '--++Open Source
| '--++Shrinkwrap
| '--++UCITA
| '-+MP3s
| '-+ Online Notes
| '-+Pat. & Copyr. Law
| '--++Fair Use
| '--+++Technology
| '--++Software Patents
| '-+Peer-to-Peer
| '-+Software Piracy
| '--++CD-RW
| '--++Internet
Dwnlds
|-Privacy
|-Risks
|-Social-Just.
Issues
|-Speech |
Study Guide
Fair Use Defined
The concept of fair use is much younger than the concept of copyrights.
It was created to protect the legitimate interests of consumers and users
from the totalitarian rights of copyright holders. It was specifically
designed as a counterbalance to copyright in order to allow commentaries,
parodies, personal backup, and other "fair uses." In this way, they were
designed to protect legitimate interests of consumers and users.
Section
107 of the copyright act of 1976 contains four factors to be considered
in determining whether a use is fair or not. The factors are:
-
The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of
a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
-
The nature of the copyrighted work;
-
The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted
work as a whole; and
-
The effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted
work.
In addition to these, Section
110 outlines exemptions for certain displays and performances, typically
for education or religious purposes.
Note that not every use that falls under one of these factors is automatically
freed from the constraints of copyrights. For example, if our Operating
Systems class distributed large sections of Microsoft's code, even for
educational purposes, it's likely that a judge would consider this to be
infringement. Also, a small clip of a movie that shows the pivotal moments
of the plot would likely be considered infrigement. The outcome is up to
the judge's weight of the factors against the copyright
owner's rights. Other myths concerning fair use can be found on Brad
Templeton's page.
Distance Education
Distance
education courses, such as this internet class, raise several issues
of fair use. In a traditional classroom, it is normally permissible to
distribute copyrighted information for the purpose of education. When going
beyond the confines of a single classroom, however, we begin to run into
questions. Is it OK to transmit these ideas beyond a classroom? The House
of Representatives report accompanying the 1976 copyright act says that
it is, "as long as the instructor and pupils are in the same building or
general area." But what about all of the outside users who are now capable
of accessing the information directed toward the students? There are some
good resources made available by the IHETS
and the University
of Texas.
Electronic Reserves
Electronic reserves present another problem. When libraries subscribed
to magazines, they were presented in a format that only allowed one patron
to read an article at a time. Now, with electronic reserves, tens or even
hundreds of library "patrons" can view an article at a time. Does this
limit the copyright owner's right to publish and reproduce a work? Guidelines
for Fair Use and Electronic Reserves list a number of conditions that
must be met in order to allow copyrighted materials to be made available
in this format. These conditions include password protection and limited
access.
Index of Topics
|